Skip to main content

Spamalot

Anyone who adding my EMAIL and subscribe it to a mailing list is an a* (pardon for my lang). Yeah, you! Spiritual&religion at Y! mailing list is a pain in the a*. I wasn't subscribe for it nor I know of its existence. This is an act of spamming. The mailing list itself from what I skimmed full of debate between Christian and Moslem.

BAH!

NONE, I said NONE, Christian or Moslem, can prove their religion scientifically. So, all would be an act of believe. Here's the list of why:
  1. All of their books are not legitimate: no literature, self-proving, and it has no reference to other works other than The Author Himself.
  2. The claims are (hardly) not reproducible by other.
  3. The Author have no previous track record to justify, to have legitimate justification of past work, or to have background education.
  4. The Author never registered in any science group or whatsoever to have collegues testify of His work or to have peer review.
  5. The Author never published the work other than to special interest group.
So, how can you justify of a work that scientifically non-justifiable?

Skip all of the readings, because all of this post is about how spam can be a mailing list. :D

On serious note, I know about these debate since 5th class in elementary school and nothing comes positively other than hatred and consuming my pride only. Seriously, no one would convert from sides, but to have more arguments in their minds and waiting to have next debate.

Inspired by:
[1] http://www.infidels.org/misc/humor.archive/
[2] http://www.answering-islam.org/Humor/index.html

===
Yeah, this post supposed to be a joke and rant. Nothing serious.

Comments

  1. There's someone already did that to you? Damn I'm late.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why so serious ?

    :p

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

STAN vs. UI

Ugh, kasihan banget adek gue. Saking kepinteran dia jadi dapet Akuntansi UI dan STAN. Jadi bingung mau masuk yang mana. Beberapa orang (termasuk orang tua gue), menyarankan masuk STAN. Gue malah memperburuk suasana dengan membela memasuki Akuntansi UI, maklum bela almamater. Duh, gue jadi merasa bersalah bikin dia ragu-ragu. Kira-kira enakan masuk mana, yah? Gue juga gak tahu keuntungan masing-masing. Hasil debat sementara: ~ Untuk jangka panjang masuk UI, untuk jangka pendek STAN. ~~Tapi, dia itu kan cewek, ntar pas menikah kemungkinan besar karir terhambat. Eits, ntar, dulu, sekarang kan jamannya emansipasi, bisa aja cowoknya yang jadi BRT. ~ STAN sarang korupsi, kalo masuk STAN jadi pegawai negeri. Kalo mau kaya harus korupsi. Tapi kalo masuk UI, lulus masuk jadi akuntan publik. Sekarang ini, orang membayar akuntan publik untuk memanipulasi nilai pajak dan aset. *SIGH*. Jadi gak ada yang beres ~ dll. Yah, udah gue jadi bingung, apa lagi dia nanya saran gue. Buah, gue gak pengalaman

I Hate Marvel Civil War Storyline In Comic

See this snippets from The Amazing Spiderman: [1] http://scans-daily.dreamwidth.org/4625006.html The snippets on [1] made it clear: Stan Lee made Spidey have a strong believe in Privacy. The comic strips show how Spidey even have to face charges because of his anonymity. The accuser even made many accusation to other entities for political attacks. A fan-art/art I've found in the 90's illustrated Spiderman standing in front of Peter Parker tomb. I don't know if that was originally from comic book or fan-made, 90's are a long time ago. That art mesmerized me and introduced me to the importance of privacy. In late nineties, I was joined to a program hold by an NGO. So, at that time I know how crucial a privacy was (and still is) to humanity. I'm not exaggerating! Humanity would fall to big financial organizations if people could not voice their fears in anonymity. Whistleblowers around the world would not dare to come up. We would not see any suppression ge