Skip to main content

The Shift of Open Source Solutions

Minio is archived


 [DISCLAIMER: THIS IS MY POINT OF VIEW AND SHALL NOT BE LINKED WITH THE COMPANY WHERE I WORK NOR ITS DECISION]


As a supporter of Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) movement and even once one of the spearhead of Indonesian FOSS movement, all I can say is that there is a great shift of what is an Open Source movement.


Ever since Eric Raymond shift the definition of Open Source, which forced Stallman to use new term: Free Software, it is clear that project that made its source open is a new strategy for new startups to gather masses. Yeah, a for-profit company seeking fame using open source strategy.


However, how far would you go to open them up?


Well, there are two things that made it not profitable:

1. You made the product too stable and easy to use that you failed to commercialized it. The biggest example is RethinkDB.

2. You made the product with permissive license (MIT/BSD clause) and cloud companies use your product and make superior offerings.


From long ago, commercialization is all about battle of offerings. I can think of few successful strategies:

1. "The software is free, but the service is ours." It was a statement by Mark Shuttleworth when he was on Jakarta attending Ubuntu conference (I forgot the year, btw). Companies open their repositories but selling the managed operation contracts.

2. Dual licensing. Use GPL or AGPL for the free software and proprietary license for closed-source software that use your software. Current software companies (Redis, HashiCorp, etc.) learned that the hard way. But, Qt is already done that since day one, since the first KDE. From the Trolltech era, Nokia, and now.

3. Freemium. Use permissive license and take the good features into the Enterprise license. This is apparently the one that MinIO would like to take.


But, here's the catch: I always the supporter of free/open source software because I believe it makes the company where I am in survived. Some of you might not remember, but there was a digital divide between third world countries and the US and its allies.


Since GNU founded and Linux was part of its offerings, the gap was reduced. We didn't have to smear our laws to use pirated solutions. Since OpenPGP opened its source code, we can protect our data like them. Kudos to the inventor to take the hit and made the global Internet safer.


And now, MinIO, like Mattermost and others, chose freemium. I believe there would be multiple migrations happening. This is inevitable and unfortunately these developers didn't know about the escalated tension between countries.


I'm Indonesian and our country is on the neutral side. But, Trump made it clear that no words can be held accountable to stabilize trust. We don't know how tomorrow will come. A tension between China and US, Russia with US and so forth. We as the third countries could be on the collateral side. Think about the other countries more affected by the tensions like countries in Europe and East Asia. As Indonesian, I think my country running in delicate ways to balance sides. Indonesia notoriously in the side Non-Block movement. We want to stay neutral, but that neutrality also comes with costs. I wish the world in peace and we all can take differences as colors of the rainbows and sunshine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STAN vs. UI

Ugh, kasihan banget adek gue. Saking kepinteran dia jadi dapet Akuntansi UI dan STAN. Jadi bingung mau masuk yang mana. Beberapa orang (termasuk orang tua gue), menyarankan masuk STAN. Gue malah memperburuk suasana dengan membela memasuki Akuntansi UI, maklum bela almamater. Duh, gue jadi merasa bersalah bikin dia ragu-ragu. Kira-kira enakan masuk mana, yah? Gue juga gak tahu keuntungan masing-masing. Hasil debat sementara: ~ Untuk jangka panjang masuk UI, untuk jangka pendek STAN. ~~Tapi, dia itu kan cewek, ntar pas menikah kemungkinan besar karir terhambat. Eits, ntar, dulu, sekarang kan jamannya emansipasi, bisa aja cowoknya yang jadi BRT. ~ STAN sarang korupsi, kalo masuk STAN jadi pegawai negeri. Kalo mau kaya harus korupsi. Tapi kalo masuk UI, lulus masuk jadi akuntan publik. Sekarang ini, orang membayar akuntan publik untuk memanipulasi nilai pajak dan aset. *SIGH*. Jadi gak ada yang beres ~ dll. Yah, udah gue jadi bingung, apa lagi dia nanya saran gue. Buah, gue gak pengalaman ...

Installing Goodix Fingerprint Reader Driver on Fedora

I currently have a Lenovo Thinkpad L14 laptop equipped with fingerprint. I was `belok` from KDE Neon to use Fedora 40 because of someone. Now I am tempted to enable my fingerprint: lsusb | grep -i fingerprint Bus 001 Device 004: ID 27c6:55b4 Shenzhen Goodix Technology Co.,Ltd. Fingerprint Reader Dump the firmware Assuming this is a fresh install, lets do some magic by getting some dependencies: sudo dnf install gcc git python-pip python-devel openssl Let's get the source code: git clone --recurse-submodules https://github.com/goodix-fp-linux-dev/goodix-fp-dump.git cd goodix-fp-dump Create an isolated Python environment: python -m venv .v source .v/bin/activate Do the magic: sudo su pip install -r requirements.txt python run_55b4.py exit There are some python scripts available. I run run_55b4.py because my device ID is 27c6: 55b4 . It will spell some nonsense, which is a good thing. That nonsense actually the firmware captured by our device. Also, I typed exit becaus...

Vibe Coding Workflow

I am currently working for having A.I. workflow for generating projects. There are two things that need to be tackled for that: 1) hallucinations; and 2) old codes. I have met several patterns to tackle those two and just need to formulate the patterns into a general flow. Thankfully, a video of building fullstack app using A.I. from Raf Dev channel inspired me to make the formulation. He used multiple A.I. engines to his need: He used Google Gemini to onboard his ideas and summarized it. He forked a boilerplate of NextJS project into a new project. Then, he added the summary from Google Gemini into a file for context. He used QWEN Code, a QWEN3 code engine that is a fork from Gemini CLI, to build the project. When working with an existing project, A.I. will take the whole project as a context. It also means that it will stick with the version used by the libraries. It also will try to update its knowledge based on the common pattern in the project. Most of the time, it will use the c...